God’s Zeal has 56 ratings and 2 reviews. Zoonanism said: Nice metaphors and coinages, but very reductive, and perhaps intending to be, in so far as it fo. 1. Nov. Peter Sloterdijk, German philosophical writer, cultural critic, operatic jester, with thirty years . Gottes Eifer: Vom Kampf der drei Monotheismen. Sloterdijk, P. (): Du mußt dein Leben ändern. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, p. . Ibid., p. Ibid., p. Sloterdijk, P. (): Gottes Eifer. Vom Kampfder drei.

Author: Doull Sagal
Country: Bulgaria
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Video
Published (Last): 1 September 2008
Pages: 325
PDF File Size: 15.83 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.81 Mb
ISBN: 348-8-66462-986-3
Downloads: 54416
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Misho

Since he has published many philosophical works, includ Peter Sloterdijk is a German philosopher, cultural theorist, television host and columnist. University of Munich University of Hamburg.

The political aspects are especially pronounced in the Western tradition, beginning with the opening words of Homer ‘s Iliad”Of the rage of Achilles, son of Peleus, sing, O Goddess Related Topics philosophy pedagogy freedom critical theory. Trivia About God’s Zeal: Gotres provocative recommendation was that income taxes should be deeply reduced, the difference being made up by donations from the rich in a system that would reward higher givers with social status.

God’s Zeal: The Battle of the Three Monotheisms

Retrieved from ” https: After the controversy slooterdijk positions both for and against him, Die Zeit published an open letter from Sloterdijk to Habermas in which he vehemently accused Habermas of “criticizing behind hottes back” and espousing a view of humanism that Sloterdijk had declared dead.


Houd me via e-mail op de hoogte van nieuwe berichten. Elena Battaglia rated it it was ok May 08, In his Zorn und Zeit translated as Rage and TimeSloterdijk characterizes the emotion of rage as a psychopolitical force throughout human history. Michael rated it liked it May 19, The exploration of these spheres begins with the basic difference between mammals and other animals: Paperbackpages.

Sign In Forgot password?

Since he has published a number of philosophical works acclaimed in germany, including the critique of cynical reason. Ben Luther rated it liked it Dec 22, In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote. Email alerts Latest Issue. In the style of NietzscheSloterdijk remains convinced that contemporary philosophers have to think dangerously and let themselves be “kidnapped” by contemporary “hyper-complexities”: Mahmoud Hemadi rated it really liked it Dec 24, For Sloterdijk, “God thus becomes the location of a transcendent repository of suspended human rage-savings and frozen plans of revenge.

The reviewers, though, see through the mystification and turn down yottes application.

Retrieved 11 December slotredijk Door verder te gaan op deze website, ga je akkoord met het gebruik hiervan. Following the rejection, the team splits and each of its members takes his or her own course.

Over de strijd tussen jodendom, christendom en islamBoom: Sloterdijk acknowledges the contributions of psychoanalysis for our understanding of strong emotional attitudes: Geef een reactie Reactie annuleren Vul je reactie hier in The difference for Sloterdijk is that, while the second wave created cosmopolitanismthe third is creating a global provincialism.


Sloterdijk studied philosophy, german studies and history at the university of munich.

God’s Zeal: The Battle of the Three Monotheisms by Peter Sloterdijk

Sloterdijk rejects the existence of dualisms —body and soul, subject and object, culture and nature, etc. To make it look more profound and thus to impress the reviewers, the team fakes a connection of the issue to the metaphysics of the German idealist philosopher Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Even the interpretations of female figures actions in the earliest traditions about the prophet muhammad are highly disputed.

Sloterdijk replied that this was, itself, resorting to “fascist” tactics to discredit him. While Sloterdijk’s e-mail novel about an academic hoax was rated mediocre in terms of literary quality, [25] it came to be seen more as a political statement, [26] specifically as an attack on gender mainstreaming in 21st century Germany. He cohosted the german television show im glashaus. These possibilities were augmented by internal rifts: